Friday, 2 October 2015

US Judge Dismisses 9/11 Case Against Saudi Arabia


93d87b907aa649f3a11fd74a2e9f4de6_18
A US judge has dismissed claims against Saudi Arabia by families of victims of the September 11, 2001, attacks, who accused the country of providing material support to al-Qaeda. Aljazeera reports:

US District Judge George Daniels in Manhattan, New York, said Saudi Arabia had sovereign immunity from damage claims by families of nearly 3,000 people killed in the attacks, and from insurers that covered losses suffered by building owners and businesses.  “The allegations in the complaint alone do not provide this court with a basis to assert jurisdiction over defendants,” Daniels wrote.
The victims had sought to supplement their case with new allegations to avoid that result, including based on testimony they secured from Zacarias Moussaoui, a former al-Qaeda operative imprisoned for his role in the attacks, Reuters reported. Daniels said even if he allowed the plaintiffs to assert those new claims, doing so would be “futile, however, because the additional allegations do not strip defendants of sovereign immunity”.
Saudi Arabia was dropped as a defendant before as judges said it was protected by sovereign immunity, but a federal appeals court in December 2013 reinstated it, saying a legal exception existed and the circumstances were extraordinary. Lawyers for the plaintiffs said they would appeal. Sean Carter, one the lawyers, said he believed the ruling was also the consequence of the US government’s decision to keep classified evidence that could be favourable to their cause.

NATO Forces Bolster Afghan Troops In Battle For Kunduz


a9a762c508364c80a78b9deefbc26889_18
The US has conducted several air strikes with the state goal of protecting coalition troops at the airport near the key northern city of Kunduz as Afghan forces continue to battle Taliban to retake it. NATO special forces have also reached Kunduz to also bolster Afghan troops after the Taliban seized the strategic city, the military coalition said on Wednesday. Aljazeera reports:

“Coalition special forces are on the ground in Kunduz advising their Afghan counterparts,” a NATO spokesman said.
The forces comprise US, British and German troops, a Western military source told AFP news agency on condition of anonymity, without specifying the number. Heavy fighting raged inside Kunduz for a third day on Wednesday as government forces, backed by US air strikes, battled Taliban fighters who had scored one of their biggest successes in 14 years of war.
“The US conducted several air strikes in the vicinity of Kunduz airport between approximately 11:30 pm September 29th and 1:30 am September 30th against individuals threatening the force,” US Army Colonel Brian Tribus said.
Pentagon officials say the air strikes are being conducted under the rules of engagements for the NATO support mission Resolute Support which authorises air strikes to protect coalition forces on the ground, but not offensive strikes to support Afghan troops.

Italian Aid Worker Killed In Bangladesh ‘By IS’

asd
Bangladesh police are investigating the murder of an Italian aid worker who was shot on Monday night. The Islamic State group says it carried oot the attack, shooting dead Cesare Tavella, 50, in the capital Dhaka’s diplomatic quarter. Police Commissioner Asaduzzaman Mia said Tavella was jogging when two attackers fired at him from behind.

The US and UK urged citizens to be cautious, saying they had information Western interests could be targeted. They have also restricted the movements of their diplomats. The BBC’s South Asia editor Joanna Jolly says it is the first time IS has claimed an attack in Bangladesh, where it has not yet announced a branch.
In its claim, IS warned that “citizens of the crusader coalition” would not be safe in Muslim nations. Police in Dhaka have not commented on the IS claim. Bangladesh has been struggling to respond to a recent rise in radical Islamist groups. Extremists have carried out a series of high-profile attacks on secular bloggers, hacking to death four bloggers – one a US citizen – so far this year. One group, Ansarullah Bangla Team, has reportedly threatened to kill secular bloggers and activists outside Bangladesh. The group was outlawed in May.
BBC.

9 Phrases Smart People Never Use In Conversation

Image result for CONVERSATION
We’ve all said things that people interpreted much differently than we thought they would. These seemingly benign comments lead to the awful feeling that only comes when you’ve planted your foot firmly into your mouth.

Verbal slip-ups often occur because we say things without knowledge of the subtle implications they carry.
Understanding these implications requires social awareness—the ability to pick up on the emotions and experiences of other people.
We lack social awareness because we’re so focused on what we’re going to say next—and how what other people are saying affects us—that we completely lose sight of other people.
This is a problem because people are complicated. You can’t hope to understand someone until you focus all of your attention in his or her direction.
The beauty of social awareness is that a few simple adjustments to what you say can vastly improve your relationships with other people.
To that end, there are some phrases that emotionally intelligent people are careful to avoid in casual conversation. The following phrases are nine of the worst offenders. You should avoid them at all costs.
1. ‘You look tired.’
Tired people are incredibly unappealing—they have droopy eyes and messy hair, they have trouble concentrating, and they’re as grouchy as they come. Telling someone he looks tired implies all of the above and then some.
Instead say: “Is everything okay?” Most people ask if someone is tired because they’re intending to be helpful (they want to know if the other person is okay). Instead of assuming someone’s disposition, just ask. This way, he can open up and share. More importantly, he will see you as concerned instead of rude.
2. ‘Wow, you’ve lost a ton of weight!’
Once again, a well-meaning comment—in this case a compliment—creates the impression that you’re being critical. Telling someone that she has lost a lot of weight suggests that she used to look fat or unattractive.
Instead say: “You look fantastic.” This one is an easy fix. Instead of comparing how she looks now to how she used to look, just compliment her for looking great. It takes the past right out of the picture.
3. ‘You were too good for her anyway.’
When someone severs ties with a relationship of any type, personal or professional, this comment implies he has bad taste and made a poor choice in the first place.
Instead say: “Her loss!” This provides the same enthusiastic support and optimism without any implied criticism.
4. ‘You always…’ or ‘You never…’
No one always or never does anything. People don’t see themselves as one-dimensional, so you shouldn’t attempt to define them as such. These phrases make people defensive and closed off to your message, which is a really bad thing because you likely use these phrases when you have something important to discuss.
Instead say: Simply point out what the other person did that’s a problem for you. Stick to the facts. If the frequency of the behavior is an issue, you can always say, “It seems like you do this often.” or “You do this often enough for me to notice.”
Related: Please Stop Saying These Ridiculous Phrases at Work
5. ‘You look great for your age.’
Using “for your” as a qualifier always comes across as condescending and rude. No one wants to be smart for an athlete or in good shape relative to other people who are also knocking on death’s door. People simply want to be smart and fit.
Instead say: “You look great.” This one is another easy fix. Genuine compliments don’t need qualifiers.
6. ‘As I said before…’
We all forget things from time to time. This phrase makes it sound as if you’re insulted at having to repeat yourself, which is hard on the recipient (someone who is genuinely interested in hearing your perspective). Getting insulted over having to repeat yourself suggests that either you’re insecure or you think you’re better than everyone else (or both!). Few people who use this phrase actually feel this way.
Instead say: When you say it again, see what you can do to convey the message in a clearer and more interesting manner. This way they’ll remember what you said.
7. ‘Good luck.’
This is a subtle one. It certainly isn’t the end of the world if you wish someone good luck, but you can do better because this phrase implies that they need luck to succeed.
Instead say: “I know you have what it takes.” This is better than wishing her luck because suggesting that she has the skills needed to succeed provides a huge boost of confidence. You’ll stand out from everyone else who simply wishes her luck.
8. ‘It’s up to you.’ or ‘Whatever you want.’
While you may be indifferent to the question, your opinion is important to the person asking (or else he wouldn’t have asked you in the first place).
Instead say: “I don’t have a strong opinion either way, but a couple things to consider are…” When you offer an opinion (even without choosing a side), it shows that you care about the person asking.
9. ‘Well at least I’ve never ___.’
This phrase is an aggressive way to shift attention away from your mistake by pointing out an old, likely irrelevant mistake the other person made (and one you should have forgiven her for by now).
Instead say: “I’m sorry.” Owning up to your mistake is the best way to bring the discussion to a more rational, calm place so that you can work things out. Admitting guilt is an amazing way to prevent escalation.
Bringing it all together
In everyday conversation, it’s the little things that make all the difference. Try these suggestions out, and you’ll be amazed at the positive response you get.
A version of this article first appeared at TalentSmart.com.

BUSTED: Paedophile Websites That Steals Photos Of Children From Social Media Sites And Repost Them On Their Sites Where They Are S*xualised

3
According to Australia’s new Children’s eSafety Commissioner, Alastair MacGibbon, half of the material found on certain paedophilia websites has been sourced or stolen from parents innocently posting images of their families online, The Independent reports.


MacGibbon said that a team of investigators looking into complaints of child abuse material had discovered tens of millions of photos of children doing everyday activities such as swimming, sports or homework.
He told the Sidney Morning Herald that while the images themselves were not exploitative, comments attached to them by strangers sexualised them – and said that parents who had no idea how easily they could be downloaded by strangers were thoughtlessly cataloguing every aspect of their children’s lives, “with no security against these obsessive efforts to obtain content”. MacGibbon pointed out that within 10 days of being uploaded, some of the content from popular social media sharing sites such as Facebook, Instagram and Kik had been viewed 1.7 million times. Images were often catalogued in ‘themes’ such as “kids at beach”, “nice boys play in river” or “gymnasts”, alongside comments that explicitly sexualised the material.
“Many users clearly identify that they have obtained the content through trawling social media accounts.The images are almost always accompanied by highly explicit and very disturbing user comments. Often, users exchange email addresses with invitations to connect outside the site to trade content.” Toby Dagg, senior investigator at the eSafety Commissioner, reported that on one paedophile site which contained at least 45 million images of children, about half the material appeared to be “sourced directly from social media”.
It was then labelled in folders entitled “Kik girls” or “my daughter’s Instagram friends”. He said that the staggeringly high numbers of images found represented just a fraction of all the material investigated every year, and warned that while the site was not hosted in Australia, it was “entirely possible” that images of Australian children were on the site.
Cyber-safety expert Susan McLean, who said that Facebook contained the best safety and security settings for restricted content, told the newspaper that “over-sharing parents” were of particular concern. “When you post anything online, does not matter where it is, you have lost control of it,” she said. “Many parents do not lock their accounts down in the same way kids do. It does not matter how innocent the photo is, if your child has got what a predator is looking for, they will take that photo.”
Source: The Independent

Woman Tells People’s Future Just By Fondling Their Backsides


screenshot_3687
A woman became famous for predicting people’s futures by touching their behinds.  Bibian Arango of Peru, sees many people each week, in her office in Lima. Her office consist of a small room packed with statues of Catholic Saints, magic potions and a mural of a Hindu God.

Scoop reports that Arango has also been on several television shows and the videos of her appearances were uploaded to the Internet.
The videos show Arango fondling the behinds of willing participants as she predicts their futures.  According to Arango, there are 4 main types of backsides, which includes the inverted heart, square, V-shaped and round.
Arango said that each type reveals clues about someone’s personality. Those with a round backside tend to be optimistic, but emotionally insecure, while those with square ones are determined individuals who care little about what others think of them, she said.

Small Dog Drives Owner’s Truck Into Lake


police_photo
A small dog was rescued from a truck after driving it into a lake, police in Maine said. The Ellsworth Police Department said that the dog drove its owner’s truck into the lake by knocking the vehicle out of gear.

The elderly owner of the truck told investigators that he had been walking the dog around Branch Lake on Saturday afternoon, and he put the dog back into his truck before the incident unfolded.
The dog hit the truck out of gear and it rolled across the parking lot and into the lake. The dog was rescued from the submerged truck by a woman who is a friend of the owner. The truck was removed from the lake, but the vehicle was deemed a total loss.
WWWN.

Police ‘Arrest’ Goat For Loitering


Police-arrest-goat-for-loitering-at-Tim-Hortons
Police in Saskatchewan said an unruly goat that insisted on sleeping in the entrance to a Tim Horton’s was “arrested” while officers sought to find its owners. UPI reports:

The Royal Canadian Mounted Police of Saskatchewan said two Warman officers were called to the Tim Horton’s early Sunday by employees who said they repeatedly led the goat out of the eatery, but the animal would just come back in through the automatic doors and try to take a nap in the entrance.
“The [RCMP] members believed he was just cold and he decided to lie down and wanted to sleep in the entrance. He was ‘arrested’ and escorted into the police vehicle. He was very unhappy with this so the members decided to take him home instead of to holding cells at the detachment,” the RCMP said.
The RCMP members went door-to-door but were unable to identify the goat’s owners and Animal Control officials told them the agency doesn’t typically deal with goats. The wayward goat was taken to a local animal hospital, where it was later reunited with its owners.

Woman Accused Of Tossing Own Newborn From Seventh Floor


092815-BABYDEATH-DM-2 NYPD at scene outside 130 West 183rd street, where a baby was dropped or thrown to it's death into rear courtyard, Bronx, NY. David McGlynn 9/28/15
A 33 year old woman from New York,  Jennifer Berry, has been charged with murder in the death of her newborn baby girl after the child was allegedly thrown to her death from a 7th floor window on Monday.


It was reported that the infant girl was found dead in the courtyard of Jennifer Berry boyfriend’s apartment, and police report indicates that she still had her umbilical cord attached when she was found.
The boyfriend of the accused told the police that he was in another room when the whole incident happened and did not know when Jennifer gave birth or threw the baby from the window. He further said that he did not even realise his girlfriend was pregnant.
Meanwhile, the police are yet to figure out the time frame between the baby’s birth and her fall from the window.

Mother Kills Her 3 Kids For Fear That Her Boyfriend Might Leave Her


kill
ANNA Duskiova, 25, killed her three newborn babies because she was worried her boyfriend might leave her.

The woman, from a village in the Czech Republic, is on trial accused of murdering her youngsters, two boys and a girl, shortly after they were born.   The court heard that the children were born healthy but Duskiova killed them and hid their bodies in the house she shared with her boyfriend, Daniel Masaryk, 47.
Dusikova confessed to the murders and claimed she was concerned her boyfriend, who didn’t want children, would leave her if he found out. She said at the court: “I was afraid of losing my boyfriend. I told him I had some health troubles and that I could not have children.”  The woman disguised her growing belly by telling Masaryk that water bloating was a side effect of her health complication.  As a result, Masaryk allegedly never noticed or suspected that she was pregnant.
Dusikova’s first baby was born in 2013 and after giving birth to the little girl in a toilet, she strangled her to death with a shoelace.  She then put the dead baby in a rucksack and hid her in the attic of the house where she lived with Masaryk. Unbelievably, a year later, she gave birth to her second baby, a little boy, and shockingly murdered him in the same way.  Dusikova had her third baby, another boy, in 2015 but instead of killing him straight away; she hid him inside a bag of dog food.
She told the court that after the third birth she fainted because she had lost so much blood and when she woke, her son was dead. After hiding the third baby in the attic with the other bodies, Dusikova needed medical help for her blood loss.  When she reached the hospital, doctors recognised she had given birth and raised the alarm when she couldn’t explain where her baby was.  Dusikova said: I cannot explain why I did this.”